OkCupid, work because of the Jokes Rainbow, Inc. v. Nanci Nette, Title Management Classification

OkCupid, work because of the Jokes Rainbow, Inc. v. Nanci Nette, Title Management Classification

OkCupid, work because of the Jokes Rainbow, Inc. v. Nanci Nette, Title Management Classification

step three. Procedural History

The latest Grievance is actually recorded to your WIPO Arbitration and you will Mediation Cardio (new “Center”) with the , one’s heart carried by email address into the Registrar a request registrar confirmation to the the disputed domain name. With the , the latest Registrar transmitted of the email address towards Cardiovascular system its confirmation response confirming one Respondent is noted as registrant and offering the email address.

The center verified your Ailment came across the brand new official criteria of the Uniform Domain name Disagreement Quality Plan (brand new “Policy” otherwise “UDRP”), the guidelines getting Uniform Domain Disagreement Solution Rules (the brand new “Rules”), as well as the WIPO Supplemental Statutes having Uniform Domain Conflict Quality Coverage (the “Extra Legislation”).

In accordance with the Guidelines, sentences 2 and cuatro, the center officially informed Respondent of the Problem, and proceedings commenced into . According to the Guidelines, section 5, the brand new deadline getting Reaction try . Respondent don’t fill out any response. Accordingly, one’s heart notified Respondent’s default to the .

The center designated Timothy D. Casey while the only panelist contained in this number on . New Panel finds out it was securely constituted. The Panel possess recorded the new Declaration out of Welcome and you may Declaration away from Impartiality and you will Independence, as required by Cardiovascular system to make certain conformity into the Laws and regulations, paragraph 7.


Complainant contends the fresh disputed website name was same as the latest OKCUPID Signature. The brand new mere addition of the nation code Ideal-Top Website name (“ccTLD”) suffix “.co” isn’t enough to distinguish or distinguish the new disputed domain on OKCUPID Trademark. Further, Complainant argues that use of your “.co” ccTLD suffix tries to take advantage of typo-travelers right down to a person occur to omitting the very last page “m” away from Complainant’s otherwise the same domain name.

Complainant then argues that Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate passions on disputed domain given that Respondent has not made use of the disputed domain name to the a bona fide providing away from goods or attributes. Specifically, Complainant contends one to Respondent’s explore diverts users to help you a “hook farm vehicle parking page” one to redirects people to most other websites providing qualities competitive in order to Complainant’s services.

Ailment states this hasn’t signed up Respondent to use new OKCUPID Trademark, you to definitely Respondent does not seem to identified from the debated domain, hence Respondent cannot appear to be and come up with people legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. Such as, Complainant cards that Respondent’s website only will bring backlinks redirecting these to contending other sites.

As for proof of crappy believe, Complainant alleges that OKCUPID domain try joined eight years until the disputed domain name and that Complainant’s liberties from the OKCUPID Signature set Respondent for the useful and you will genuine see from Complainant’s rightplainant subsequent alleges one Respondent’s utilization of the debated website name to-drive consumers so you’re able to other sites providing aggressive qualities comprises bad trust.

six. Talk and Results

Because out-of Respondent’s incapacity to react in order to Complainant’s contentions, the Committee will beat Complainant’s contentions since correct and you can undisputed until it’s unrealistic or so many to-do if you don’t.

An effective. Similar or Confusingly Comparable

Complainant’s signature membership in the united states is enough to present one Complainant possess trademark legal rights regarding the OKCUPID Signature.

Complainant argues that debated domain name includes the new totality away from which can be just like the latest OKCUPID Signature hence new ccTLD suffix is actually either worthless or next results in confusion amongst the disputed website name and you will Respondent’s use and you can Complainant’s Tradee try identical on OKCUPID Trademark and therefore the incorporation straight from the source of the ccTLD suffix “.co” is typically forgotten since the a scientific requirements and do nothing to further identify the disputed domain name on OKCUPID Signature.

B. Legal rights otherwise Genuine Hobbies

Brand new Committee finds you to Respondent has no best otherwise legitimate focus in the argument website name. Respondent cannot appear to be known of the disputed domain nameplainant has not licensed Respondent to use otherwise register brand new debated website name. The links toward Respondent’s web site do nothing which will make people legitimate passions about disputed website name as it is well established one such website links, which lead Online users to Complainant’s competition, do not comprise a bona-fide giving of products otherwise properties.

C. Registered and you will Utilized in Bad Faith

Because of the time from Complainant’s membership of one’s OKCUPID Signature and you may include in organization towards listed goods, and the time away from Respondent’s after that membership of one’s disputed website name term, having fun with conditions you to definitely certainly member the new disputed domain name which have Complainant’s merchandise, the Panel finds one to subscription of your disputed domain name was from inside the crappy faith.

The newest Committee notes that the debated domain name is actually left having a website holding links so you’re able to functions that compete with those of Complainant allegedly creating click-by way of revenue, which can not be from the coincidence. Which, new Committee discovers particularly incorporate to make up include in bad trust consistent with paragraph cuatro(b)(iv) of Rules.

eight. Choice

To the foregoing causes, relative to sentences cuatro(i) of your Rules and you may fifteen of Rules, the fresh Committee orders that debated domain become moved to Complainant.

Back to top